A newbs perspective

Iā€™ll start by saying how impressed I am with the quality and the feel of this game. In all honesty I tried this game because I had internet issues and my god am I glad that I did. The visuals are gorgeous, the animations are impactful and satisfying, the game play is uniquely tactical, the tutorials are also a brilliant idea, you have a great community, and there are great insentives in place to help new players.

However, I do have some critisisms, Iā€™ve only been playing a couple of days but I figured initial impressions are something you value since youā€™re trying to bring in new players. Please let me know if im miss judging or youā€™ve already discussed these thoughts.

Firstly, I feel pretty useless with the starter decks. Even with all the chests Iā€™ve had thrown at me, even using Kripps promotional codes, completing as many of the solo battles/puzzles that i could (including using my gold to buy 2). And I still dont have enough to build a deck I feel is usable (even trawling through your deck hub). Iā€™ve heard other people have a different experience but i spent some of my memoria on blue cards which I canā€™t really use, which may be entirely my fault. However, you could have given some direction in terms of early investment. Maybe Iā€™m supposed to focus on Pandora for now but there is a limit to how often I can play it, especially when, without game knowledge it is likely for you to lose. Also, forcing you to play online in order to be able to afford more tutorial missions doesnt make all that much sense.

To fix this you could make more of the solo missions free, maybe giving you some better cards, or one or two competative decks, but more realisticaly make a bigger focus on youtube content. Bare in mind I have read through most of the academy, there is a limit it is impossible to pass of how much you can learn from reading about any game. Something a little closer to the champion spotlight with league and smite. Maybe a deck spotlight.

Secondly, and my biggest gripe is that it really feels like you are attempting to follow Hearthstone in order to draw from their audience, mildly in visuals (Iā€™ve seen some earlier builds for the HUD and it looks more unique, visually appealing and more user friendly), and more obviously with your marketing:

  • Implimenting more RNG; RNG is a great hook and it works BRILLIANTLY in Hearthstone with a pretty simplistic game mechanics wise, they can create very entertaining combos and decks (unstable portal for example) but in a game like yours which is more deep and complex, you have so much room to be strategic and competative, i realise you cant avoid it in a card game but you can avoid adding to it. Obviously Hearthstone has its competative scene but RNG will always deduct from the competative experience, even when that RNG can be manipulated.

  • The shop - apears almost identical just with chests instead of packs, when you open a pack it does the flashing lights and explosions animation (which is cool, they did a good job of that) but you could do so much more. Having colour based packs for example (what the hell happened to that!? it worked so well), Goki is a great example of something unique. Atleast do something that under cuts Hearthstone, thats how marketing outside of the entertainment industry works: ā€˜you get an extra 10 packs when you buy a 50 pack bundleā€™ for an under researched example.

My point is that what Blizzard has, with all there money and experience is a perfect harmony between marketing and gameplay. Which is something you do not have, so dont copy, it wouldnt fly with gameplay and it simply doesnt work with marketing. You have something unique and very special here, treat it as such, in every aspect.
Hearthstone players donā€™t want a hearthstone alternative. Non-hearthstone players want a hearthstone alternative.

5 Likes

ā€œHearthstone players donā€™t want a hearthstone alternative. Non-hearthstone players want a hearthstone alternativeā€ - 100% true

4 Likes

Regarding the Solo content it used to be 100% free and I remember spending my 20 first hours only on puzzles and against AI. I loved it ! :slight_smile:

Dunno why they changed it, maybe in a way to sync the early gold. =/

1 Like

Hi! Glad your liking Faeria so far :slight_smile:

For Youtube content, Aquablad created a ton of amazing videos for beginners, showing off decks aimed for both beginners with small collections and more experienced players.

Take a look at PlayFaerias youtube channel, its no longer active but it has some great stuff.

Then there is FaeriaTeamā€™s youtube channel, but you have probably already seen those if you are active on the Hub.

I would also like to recommend @luuu90ā€™s new video

And last but not least, check out my guide on How to Improve at Faeria :slight_smile: How to improve at Faeria - A guide

And yes, it would be supercool to have the colored packs/chests again!

3 Likes

Thanks Jok3se, Iā€™ve just been watching you on MetaGamingTV. Iā€™ve been on those channels and Iā€™ve found the quality of most videos to be a littleā€¦ lack luster. No offence to Luu but his mic quality plus his limited english make him hard to understand. Iā€™m talking about something set up by the devs themselves. Iā€™ll definitely take a look at your guide :slight_smile:

Donā€™t forget the reddit thread: Information for beginners

2 Likes

Just realised you have some content up too! Awesome.

I entirely agree with color based packs/chests. New players could dedicate themselves to a color and have a greater chance of building a competitive deck. Would be a great solution for uniqueness, new players, and a better rewards system.

2 Likes

Yeah, coloured packs would make the game more accessible.