A few more here :
- Elderwood Hermit : +2/+4 instead (Can target a dead creature, in which case it won’t save it even if its health goes in positive)
- Everbloom Wisp : Only while on the fields
- Possessed Ursus : Its attack doubles
A few more here :
Thanks again :D, specified its the current attack of Possessed Ursus that doubles, not the base (thus giving +1 everytime).
You were pretty efficient this time
Forest :
Water :
Once again thank you, Could you please just delete your first commentary as I need to stick a comment below my initial post. The forum won’t let me type as much as I do in 1 post
Last precisions are arrived !
Mountain :
Desert :
Multi-colored :
Many thanks to you for doing this admirable job !
It is an honor for me to be able to help just a lil any player that find this list. Sadly it doesn’t seem to be known alot yet, If anyone can spread the worst that this list exist, That would be appreciated.
Updated with your precision Foxclear, again thank you alot for all the help and support you gave me
Primeval Colossus: Text: Cost 1 faeria less for each special land you have(Minimum cost:6)
Oracle: Cost 1 faeria less for each special land you have(Minimum cost:6)
Nope: “Minimum cost: 11 less than original cost, but other reductions will reduce it further, such as Spring Moochi or Bloomsprite”
Indeed, this works for all Colossi (via Spring Mochi for instance).
Thanks I will update all collosi with this information. Special thanks to Taiyodori
Interactions regarding Sharra, the Dragonslayer / Ruunin’s Shrine / Protection (effect) / Combat effects:
Shrine on board / creature has protection -> Shrine takes damage, protection stays
Shrine / Sharra being attacked for 4+ damage -> Shrine takes damage, even if Sharra’d ignore it (probably a bug?)
Sharra / Protection -> Protection is NOT being popped with damage 4+
Shrine / Sharra / Protection -> Shrine takes damage, protection stays
Shrine / Combat -> Combat effects trigger as usual
Thanks to Mark (MrLink) and phelbin for the testings.
Actually not a bug : Sharra works with Shrine in the same way as protection does : damage is redirected to Shrine before being dealt, so it’s not nullified by protection, nor Sharra’s effect. In the same way, deathtouch will be nullified as well against Shrine as no damage is dealt to the creature.
anyway, if interaction with Sharra is a bug, then interaction with protection is one as well
Being able to explain why something works as it does, doesn’t necessarily making it working as intended or - to the reader of the card - as expected. Hence, something striking as a bug (=not working as intended).
What I’d understand Sharra working like, when I read its text, is: “If it would be dealt 4+ damage, no damage is dealt (= ignored)”.
Hence, the way it works with protection/deathtouch is just as I’d expect it: Protection isn’t popped and death touch isn’t procced either, because no damage was dealt. The way it works with Shrine is very unexpected: Ignore the damage sounds - to me - that there should be no damage that could be dealt to the Shrine.
Regarding Protection / Shrine, I couldn’t tell at all without hindsight. Just by reading the text, it could mean protection is popped, Shrine receives no damage or - like it actually is - Shrine receives full damage, Protection is not being popped.
I believe it’s the same with protection, then. I mean, if damage is dealt to Sharra/protected creature no matter what, then it’s redirected to Shrine before it’s effective on Sharra/protected creature. Otherwise, it’s Sharra/protection that works before Shrine, and Shrine effect is ignored. I believe it’s the correct behavior for what’s written on the cards as I understand it, but it surely can be confusing. However, I don’t see why you think interaction with Sharra is a bug and not protection as well. that’s the same thing in both cases : whether or not damage should be redirected before being dealt.
Well, by reading the text I’d always assume that Sharra checks before Shrine: Sharra “ignores” damage and the Shrine redirects damage “whenever damage would be dealt to you or a creature you control, it’s dealt to this structure instead”. Sharra ignoring 4+ damage leads me to the expectation that there would be no damage dealt, hence nothing to be redirected.
Protection, on the other hand, reads: “The next time this creature would take damage, it ignores it and loses protection instead.”
If “this” creature is Sharra, then no damage would be dealt, if it’s 4+. Same goes for the wording of Shrine. Hence, I consider it a bug.
If “this” creature is anything else, then I’d say Shrine’s text (“you or any creature you control”) is more open/global than that of protection, therefore redirecting it, leaving no damage that would now be dealt to “this” (specific) creature.
I admit, though, the latter might as well go vice versa. Hence, maybe a bug, maybe working as intended. Couldn’t tell. It could depend on what was in the board first, the protection or the shrine.
After all, I’d think it safe to assume that Sharra, Shrine and Protection should be checked in this order:
That’s actually a valid point
However if I think outside the box and try to imagine how things would happen on a battlefield, I can picture an attack being redirected to Shrine when it targets Sharra/a protected creature. That attack never reaches its target, so it doesn’t pop the fragile bubble, and Sharra doesn’t have the opportunity to use its abilities to avoid that attack, no matter how she does it Poor Shrine doesn’t know if the target might be saved from the blow, it blindly redirects it to itself !
As for Protection/Sharra, well … it depends of how she nullifies the attacks : if she does avoid the attack, then the bubble should avoid it as well and remain untouched, but if she can somehow endure it because of her magical equipment or whatever, then the attack would pop the bubble before reaching her.
So both of these behaviors would be correct to me (but by wording, I would still believe that it’s working as it should)
Did you try to put sharra before shrine? and the opposite? I want to be sure its not because of entering priority
Well, according to Mark (MrLink) and phelbin, who did the tests, the order of board placement wouldn’t matter. That was, when I asked about the very same thing regarding the order of board placement of Shrine and Protection. I don’t think they tested this further, though, so I can’t tell you for sure.
Last question, Structure got priority? I mean will their ability always activate before creatures/Spell ability if they interact with them? Then it would most likely be a game mechanics. If not then I will gladly add more information towards both cards
Edit: I still need someone to tell me if Structure have priority over other ability.
Well, do you have another example where this question could have a meaning ? I personnaly don’t see another case where we could ask this question, but maybe …
I guess this is a question for the dev, It must be written somewhere in the coding of the game.